mythsthe wider recordWPP2024advertising and marketing

everyone assumed:

a meeting with our CEO's face and voice can't be faked

what was actually true:

A familiar face and a matching voice are no longer proof of who is on the call.

how it happened

  1. whofraudstersCEO photo, cloned voice
  2. the targetan agency leaderasked to set up a business
  3. how it stoppedattempt failedCEO warned all staff
where it was aimed where it stopped

what everyone assumed

When the face is familiar and the voice matches and the meeting carries the weight of the org chart, the brain stops auditing and starts cooperating. That is not a lapse, it is how meetings are supposed to work. A leader who interrogated the identity of everyone on every call would not last a week, so we extend trust to the people we recognise, and recognition is exactly what was being manufactured.

what happened

The setup did not begin in the meeting. According to the account WPP’s chief executive Mark Read later gave in an email to staff, the fraudsters first built a WhatsApp account using a publicly available image of him, the kind of photo that sits on a corporate site and an investor deck and a hundred news pages. From there they arranged the Teams meeting. Inside it they ran a voice clone of one executive and played YouTube footage to supply the moving face, while impersonating Read himself off-camera through the meeting chat. Every ingredient was something the company had already published or said in public.

step by step

  1. a WhatsApp account with the CEO's public photo
  2. a Teams meeting with a cloned voice and YouTube videoThe CEO is impersonated in chat.the assumption breaks here
  3. the targeted leader does not act
  4. 2024the CEO warns staffNo money moves.

how it surfaced

The attempt failed. The targeted leader did not act on it, and Read described the scam in an email to leadership, asking colleagues to stay alert to techniques that go beyond email and into virtual meetings, AI, and deepfakes. The figure that matters here is not a loss. It is the count of synthetic elements stacked into one call: a cloned voice, repurposed video, a spoofed messaging account, all assembled from material the public could find. No money moved.

A familiar face and a matching voice are no longer proof of who is on the call.

They are now things that can be assembled from whatever the company has already put into the world.

picture it at a company like yours

The company here is made up. The other two paths are not: they happened, and each links to the story.

your company
a normal dayA senior manager gets a message from the CEO's account asking for a quick video call.
the gap nobody seesThe call uses a cloned voice and real video clips of the CEO.a payment that can be approved on trust
  1. in this story
    the day it mattersThe fake CEO asks for money and personal details for a 'new venture'.
    what it costs youThe manager says no, and your process held because someone paused.
  2. or it goes like this
    howA video call full of deepfaked executives asks for urgent transfers.
    what leavesmoney, in several transfers in one daywho ends up with itfraudsters who built the call
    it happenedArup deepfake fraud, 2024
  3. or it goes like this
    howInvoices arrive in a real supplier's name with new bank details.
    what leavesmonths of supplier paymentswho ends up with ita fraudster abroad
    it happenedFacebook and Google, 2019

sources

  1. The Guardian, CEO of world's biggest advertising firm targeted by deepfake scam ,
  2. Marketing-Interactive, WPP CEO Mark Read targeted by deepfake AI scam ,
  3. ISTARI, Vignette of the Month: CEO Deepfake at WPP ,
  4. OECD.AI, WPP Executives Targeted by Deepfake Scam Using AI Voice Cloning ,

← all myths

your turn

what you can do about it

  1. this week

    Find the approval step that does not rely on a call, a chat or a face.

    Someone on your team will join a video call this week where a senior person asks, with some urgency, for a payment or a set of credentials or a quiet favour outside the usual process. The call will look right. The one place to look this week is your payment and onboarding approvals: is there a step that does not live inside any meeting, a callback to a known number or a second approver, that an urgent request has to pass through no matter whose face is on screen. WPP's attempt was stopped by a person who did not act on the call alone.

  2. go deeper

  3. if you're not sure where to start

    Run the offboarding checklist on one leaver. It covers every account and token to close when someone leaves.

    open the checklist →

the letter · every two weeks

one access gap in your inbox, with the fix.

Every issue takes one way access creeps in, shows a real incident where it went wrong, and ends with one thing to check that week. Written for the people who run the tools, without a security team behind them.

  • 1one mechanism, explained plainly
  • 2one real incident, taken apart
  • 3one step you can take on Monday

get the next issue

One email every two weeks. Your address stays here and is never passed to vendors. One click to unsubscribe. Privacy.